I'm not talking about RPM's, I'm talking about fuel use. The idea of this would reduce electric draw for low fuel use, and increase proportionally for higher.
Type: Posts; User: Owen_
I'm not talking about RPM's, I'm talking about fuel use. The idea of this would reduce electric draw for low fuel use, and increase proportionally for higher.
That is an option, but would require interpreting the TPS's (throttle position sensor) voltage. You could also use a combination or rpm and the MAP signal. The great advantage to the fuel injector...
Okay, so there seems to be some high current transistors on the market these days. So splicing into the injector control line, and using it as the base should be simple. Injectors have around 60ohm...
If the objective was the have a RPM basted controller, they yes...
Still not what I was talking about...
The idea is that a fuel injector signal varies in length (for fuel mix) and in frequency (engine speed). Also it will cut off completely in DFCO (deceleration fuel cup off) mode.
Therefor if this...
Yes, that is that standard way of setting things up, but not at all what I'm talking about.
It seems as though it would be ideal to use a proportional amount of HHO as you would petrel, for many reasons. I'd be interested to go into that, but I first what to know how feasible this would be...