Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 32 of 32

Thread: Series vs. Parallel Configuration

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by myoldyourgold View Post
    Media blasting works a lot better than cross hatching and gives you much more surface area and much finer bubbles. Production increases heat goes down. Small bubbles prevent hot spots on the plates, lowers resistance, bubbles release faster and the production of Cr6 is reduced when using stainless. It is critical to make sure every plate is exactly the same. Things are a lot different when using nickle plates or a combination of nickle and stainless. Testing is on going in this area.

    All of this changes the formula as far as optimum resistance per square inch. Each reactor is different and one most be able to tune it by controlling the electrolyte as I am not a PWM person. Measuring temperature accurately and production is critical to find the sweet spot. There is a definite sweet spot which can be found with some effort. The whole object for me is to get the amps down and the production up with a gas that works with the cars ECU without the use of electronics. It is a challenge but has been done just needs simplifying so it can be duplicated easily every time and under different conditions. Some cars are more of a challenge than others and results vary.
    Would using a sand blaster work instead of cross hatching or is this to much?

  2. #32
    Yes, the preferred method is sand blasting over glass beads, and cross sanding.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •