Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: PWM Power Supply Unit - Features suggestions wanted

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    510

    PWM Power Supply Unit - Features suggestions wanted

    Hey, all! I came across this forum via Zero Fossil Fuel's Website. I've been fascinated by electrolysis and producing Hydrogen for years. I'm writing this post to try to get some suggestions for a device I'm making... But first, a little info about me...

    I'm in my senior year studying Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas. I love designing electronics. I've been tinkering around with hydrogen production for a few years now, off and on. I've been learning alot, these past 3 years in school, and I hope some of my insight into the electrical aspects of HHO can be an asset to the community. This is my first posting, and I hope only the first of many.

    Now, let me get to the meat of this post. I'm currently designing a new PWM unit for HHO Production. I'm designing this because it's a really fun project for me, and also because I hope it can be a VERY valuable tool for everyone here. This little gadget is extremely different from every unit I've seen in use. It is NOT a simple frequency/duty cycle adjuster. It's more like a computer. Well, it IS a computer in a way. It has a sophisticated 8 core multiprocessor inside that allows it to do some really funky things... This gadget has the ability to interface with your computer/laptop, and display all sorts of real-time data. It's main purpose is to be a data collection tool, in addition to the onboard 75A high frequency PWM unit(>500kHz, and under some conditions into the MHz range...). Some of the features include:

    1. Real-time data logging of current consumption, voltage, power consumption, HHO cell temperature, among various other things.
    2. Real-time graphing of all the items listed above, for visual analysis.
    3. Frequency sweeping, and logging information about power consumption vs. frequency. This could be used as a major tool to find any sort of resonant frequency of your cell...
    4. Programmable test procedures - e.g. running the PWM for a precise amount of time, then turning off automatically, or when a certain gas pressure is reached(under development), among many more.
    5. Ability to interface with your PC, or run standalone as a regular PWM unit with minimal additional features.
    6. FULLY UPGRADEABLE SOFTWARE! The best part about this device, is when the community wants a new feature added, I can program this into the device, and mass distribute the update to anyone who has a unit. The update would be on your computer, and would be automatically downloaded to the device upon startup. Just connect a USB cable, and BAM! New features(and hopefully none will ever occur, but bug fixes)!
    7. More suggestions needed! I'm still designing this device, and would really like some input from you guys as far as what you would want in a device like this.

    I'd like to start building some of these units, and getting some beta testers. If you are interested in the testing phase, let me know. I'm not looking to make a big profit, so I'm going to try and get these to be priced under $100(hopefully). In the mean time, I need TESTERS!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    189
    count me in bro... i'ld love to beta test for you. I was looking for a computer interfaced pwm anyway.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Anchorage Ak
    Posts
    954
    That is what we need. A real computer attached with the ability to program in what we want. My suggestion to make this thing really be very useful would to have the fuel injector pulse width actually control the duty cycle. More fuel would equal more HHO. That is the one issue that I have not been able to beat. When I crank my cell up to produce what my truck really needs my idle goes crazy. My truck becomes almost undrivable because it idles too fast. I then turn the cell down so the truck will idle and I lose gains at normal crusing speeds. I really need the best of both worlds to get what I need.

    Larry
    2008 Nissan Frontier 4X4 Nismo. 12 MPG baseline with my normal commute and heavy stop and go daily driving. Generator installed and working on 3/29/2009

    Up to 14.5 MPG with no enhancers. Still testing the effects of lots of HHO and no electronic enhancers.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,174

    Lightbulb

    My simple system idea.

    Engines can run leaner than 14.7:1 but the ECU forces it to remain 14.7:1.


    OTOH Lean mixtures equate to higher CHT and EGT.


    I suggest a link between CHT/GGT and the pulse width of the fuel pump.

    Think of it as a CHT thermostat.

    The circuit would maintain the maximum safe CHT/EGT and then increase the pulse width to reduce the temperature.


    This circuit in addition the air restriction, could realize about a 20% increase in MPG without HHO.

    (Air restriction fools the ECU into thinking that the car is being fed less dense air at at a mile high altitude as in Denver, CO.

    The ECU will reduce the gas to maintain the programmed 14.7:1 NOT LEAN))

    However, I would use HHO to reduce the emissions if the above did not yield acceptable emission results.

    BoyntonStu

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    510
    Thos are great ideas! I think adding in support for automatically adjusting output while driving is a awesome! I'll definitely need a tester for that, since I'm not equiped to do that in my car right now... That's going to need alot of work though. I'm taking a control systems class this summer, so I hope it can help with that sort of thing. Afterall, the device would have to be a type of control system for regulating the production - which it totally has the potential to do.

    As far as "in the lab" stuff goes, that's the stuff I'm really looking for(for now). I'm trying to get this thing to be a really sophisticated lab instrument/powerful PWM with high current handling(done).

    Oh, one feature I thought of last night - Battery Charging/Monitoring! I'm thinking about adding a couple of "jacks" to clip on a battery charger. This way, the gadget can also act as a sophisticated battery charging system. A normal battery charger just tries to cram charge into the battery, even when it's fully charged. My "internal" battery charger would monitor the voltage on the battery, and determine it's state of charge. If it's really low, it could apply certain charging algorithms to increase the life of the battery. Of course, it would also disconnect when the battery is fully charged so you don't have to worry about over charging.

    Most of these ideas I have are more "bench top" oriented ideas. I'd love to have this mounted in a car/truck for REAL use one day, but for now I'm trying to use it for testing just the production of HHO.

    Thanks guys!

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by H2OPWR View Post
    That is what we need. A real computer attached with the ability to program in what we want. My suggestion to make this thing really be very useful would to have the fuel injector pulse width actually control the duty cycle. More fuel would equal more HHO. That is the one issue that I have not been able to beat. When I crank my cell up to produce what my truck really needs my idle goes crazy. My truck becomes almost undrivable because it idles too fast. I then turn the cell down so the truck will idle and I lose gains at normal crusing speeds. I really need the best of both worlds to get what I need.

    Larry
    Wouldn't there be a lag in the response time that the HHO was requested and when it was produced and actually got to the intake? It may still be better then what you have now.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Anchorage Ak
    Posts
    954
    Quote Originally Posted by Bassman View Post
    Wouldn't there be a lag in the response time that the HHO was requested and when it was produced and actually got to the intake? It may still be better then what you have now.
    As long as the supply lines were full of HHO and the cell and bubbler were full of HHO then the supply should be almost immediate with very little lag. If the cell was hooked to vacuum then the responce would lag quite a bit. None the less the end product would be better than anything we have now.

    Larry
    2008 Nissan Frontier 4X4 Nismo. 12 MPG baseline with my normal commute and heavy stop and go daily driving. Generator installed and working on 3/29/2009

    Up to 14.5 MPG with no enhancers. Still testing the effects of lots of HHO and no electronic enhancers.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    510
    I think the solution to the problem of "delay", is a little analagous to a capacitor in electronics. If you have a storage tank that stores HHO under a SLIGHT pressure, and a valve on the output to allow the gas to go into the engine and escape the tank, then the problem could be alleviated somewhat. Granted, a storage tank is dangerous, but it would certainly help with the response time.

    I'm still looking for ideas and beta testers though...

  9. #9
    kasari Guest

    Talking

    Count me in...

    Working on a Whole Home Heater using HHO. Already have a Energy Management System (EMS) (BAS) in my house. I could incorporate your devide in this system.

    Control Freak..

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    627
    Quote Originally Posted by kasari View Post
    Count me in...

    Working on a Whole Home Heater using HHO. Already have a Energy Management System (EMS) (BAS) in my house. I could incorporate your devide in this system.

    Control Freak..
    Not sure I understand what you mean by this... the whole idea here is so that he can control the vehicle's ECU. How do you plan to incorporate this into a home heating unit? All you are worried about is the average temperature of each room. Control tends to be rather binary. On/Off. The EMS does the rest (ie. controls which vents are open/closed) What possible good would it be to add a computer that takes in information like O2 sensor or EGT (neither exist in a home) and puts out a control signal to lean the engine (again useless in the home). Am I just missing something?

    Edit: I suppose the logging feature would be handy.
    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling that Orwell was an optimist!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •