Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Graphite VS Stainless Steel

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    23

    Stainless Steel

    I have 40 hours up bench testing my SS 316, they show no signs of deteriation. It absorbs 30volt 100 amp continious. The plates in my HOD are 80 sq inches each, 14 of them. Making 10 LPM.
    Llew

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    21

    Question NiTi, Copper, Alluminum, Brass electrodes?

    Hi All,

    I am pretty new at this...

    I read that if the electrical conductivity of Copper (Cu) was considered 100%, Stainless stell would be around 3.5%... so why the modern dry cells are using SS? Is it for electrode durability, or we don't want too much electrical conductivity?

    My guess would be durability of SS x Cu.

    Ah, what about Titanium (electrical conductivity around 3.1%) similar to SS... And what about the Ni-Ti alloy?

    Last question! Can we use aluminum electrodes?

    Maybe in some of the electrodes above the components would act as electrolyzers..

    Sorry for the question flood!

    Rod.
    (Bulding my 1st dry cell, SS plates + Ni-Ti filaments)

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    110
    Quote Originally Posted by rboos View Post
    Hi All,

    I am pretty new at this...

    I read that if the electrical conductivity of Copper (Cu) was considered 100%, Stainless stell would be around 3.5%... so why the modern dry cells are using SS? Is it for electrode durability, or we don't want too much electrical conductivity?

    My guess would be durability of SS x Cu.

    Ah, what about Titanium (electrical conductivity around 3.1%) similar to SS... And what about the Ni-Ti alloy?

    Last question! Can we use aluminum electrodes?

    Maybe in some of the electrodes above the components would act as electrolyzers..

    Sorry for the question flood!

    Rod.
    (Bulding my 1st dry cell, SS plates + Ni-Ti filaments)
    Answer: SS for durability & affordability

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    25

    Electrical Resistivity of Cell Plates

    Ok here we go, some Electrical Resistivity info for you guys:
    (did write conductivity originally)

    Cu
    ohm-cm 0.00000170
    ohm-cir-mil/ft 10.2
    ohm-in 6.69e-7
    ohm-m 1.70e-8
    ohm-mm²/m 0.0170

    Ti
    ohm-cm 0.0000554
    ohm-cir-mil/ft 333
    ohm-in 0.0000218
    ohm-m 5.54e-7
    ohm-mm²/m 0.554

    304L
    0.0000720 ohm-cm
    ohm-cir-mil/ft 433
    ohm-in 0.0000283
    ohm-m 7.20e-7
    ohm-mm²/m 0.720

    316 or 316L as same
    ohm-cm 0.0000740
    ohm-cir-mil/ft 445
    ohm-in 0.0000291
    ohm-m 7.40e-7
    ohm-mm²/m 0.740

    Extruded Graphite
    ohm-cm 0.000750
    ohm-cir-mil/ft 4510
    ohm-in 0.000295
    ohm-m 0.00000750
    ohm-mm²/m 7.50


    Should answer a few questions

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    21

    Graphite Engraved Stainless Steel Plates with guide pattern

    Hmm... those are condutivity values, or resistivity? the copper is lower in value than the SS... shouldn't be the opposite?

    Another idea, just for the mad scientists:

    what about this process of marking (electro-engraving?? ) the SS with a "tatoo" of graphite... we could apply a 'inverted V' pattern to 'guide' the bubbles, or just a set of 'straight vertical lines' to guide them... with graphite agains the SS plates?

    It could make the total area bigger, I found a site with some examples:

    Graphite engraved SS examples (artistic)

    Just an idea..

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    25
    Sorry, my mistake - was Rather late last night.

    they are the Electrical Resistivity values.

    Will edit my post too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •