Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: H2-drytube

  1. #1

    H2-drytube

    Anyone heard of it or have any personal experience, or thoughts? its www.h2extreme.com i think, but they are not selling it right now. Their video looks like its good but i want to see if anyone has tried one first hand or anything. Thanks-Jacob

  2. #2
    ok i found an earlier video on the web he had made, and it looked like he was making those joe cells. So i think the H2 may be one of those? Anyone know if thats the design he used? Also anyone have experience with onf like that, his videos seem like its good, but wanted some real people opinions. Thanks

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2

    drytube cell

    yeah been checkin these 4 a while..looks excellent...but cant find any details on construction,got a pretty good idea how there put together, its just those little practical details...its a bit out of order,and not in the spirit of this tech not to share ..!guess i'll have to start experimenting.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Sure looks like a pretty robust design. Not sure how it's assembled though. Would need to know at least that before I consider one of these. I don't think I'm on my own on this.

    Cheers,
    Martin.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    10
    I found this link on their website a few days ago.

    http://www.h2extreme.com/smalltorch.pdf

    I hope it helps.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Hi Plasma,

    It certainly clears one aspect of the design up, but also leads to a few more questions.

    I'm wondering if the design is not as (theoretically) efficient as a drycell using similar materials etc, as the current density would decrease towards the outer tubes. What diameter is the inner tube with respect to the outer one? I wonder how it's sealed...

    Interesting design for sure.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    10
    I also doubt it's efficiency is as good as a drycell as it has about 2.3 v per tube gap. On the website, it claims you will get an mmw of 6 to 7.7 or you get your money back! Maby the cell has very little current leakage.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by plasma View Post
    I also doubt it's efficiency is as good as a drycell as it has about 2.3 v per tube gap. On the website, it claims you will get an mmw of 6 to 7.7 or you get your money back! Maby the cell has very little current leakage.
    Ha! 7.7 mmw half of which is steam, maybe.
    It's not the worst design out there, by far (just look at waterforgas), but a crude dry-cell is likely going to do better.
    I=V/R so R=V/I and V=I*R
    P=V*I
    (I=Amps, V=volts, P= power in watts, R=resistance in ohms)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stanfordville, NY
    Posts
    799
    LOL>>Water For Gas. Good 'ol Ozzie Freedom! Master shyster and scammer.
    To be fair and give credit where credit is due, if it weren't for his marketing brilliance and greed, 99% of us would never have heard of HHO, and we'd all be spending our time and money on something else!
    Who else would be able to get away with selling 80 grams of KOH for TEN BUCKS?
    Hell, we might not have ever even heard of Smacktard or Desertphile.
    Oh, what a dismal world this would have been.....
    1998 Explorer 4x4, 4.0
    14 cell / 2 stack 6x9" drycell reactor 28%KOH dual EFIE, MAF enhancer, IAT & ECT controllers, 2.4 LPM @ 30 amps. 6.35 MMW http://reduceyourfuelbill.com.au/forum/index.php

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •