Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Here is my new fuel cell

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15

    Here is my new fuel cell >> Now shipping!

    Who wants one?

    $240 Single up to 1.5L engines
    $360 Dual up to 2.5L engines
    $480 Triple up to 4L engines

    Hurry up these mate prices wont last long.

    Features:

    - Structure ultra solid (no rubber!) life longevity 90% longer than a standard dry cell
    - Improved insulated surface, reducing risks of short circuits
    - Optimised plate holes for minimum current leakage and best flow
    - Side baffles allowing perfect water pressure
    - 0.7 mm 316 stainless steel plates / 3mm 304 stainless steel brackets
    - High quality stainless steel "push-in" fittings (not on picture)


  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15
    Beneath 20A under brute force.

    Plate config is +nnnnn-

    The hot point on that cell is the sharp engineering and its toughness and reduced wear and tear. A significant increased efficiency will come with the MK2, next year.

    160x160mm active surface per electrode.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stanfordville, NY
    Posts
    799
    Very nice looking reactor! Looks like you've put a lot of effort into your build.
    1998 Explorer 4x4, 4.0
    14 cell / 2 stack 6x9" drycell reactor 28%KOH dual EFIE, MAF enhancer, IAT & ECT controllers, 2.4 LPM @ 30 amps. 6.35 MMW http://reduceyourfuelbill.com.au/forum/index.php

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15
    not really, we came up with that pretty quick actually.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Zipster View Post
    Who wants one?

    $240 Single up to 1.5L engines
    $360 Dual up to 2.5L engines
    $480 Triple up to 4L engines

    Hurry up these mate prices wont last long.

    Features:

    - Structure ultra solid (no rubber!) life longevity 90% longer than a standard dry cell
    - Improved insulated surface, reducing risks of short circuits
    - Optimised plate holes for minimum current leakage and best flow
    - Side baffles allowing perfect water pressure
    - 0.7 mm 316 stainless steel plates / 3mm 304 stainless steel brackets
    - High quality stainless steel "push-in" fittings (not on picture)

    Thanks you for the post.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts
    3

    About the Wiring of This Unit

    For Zipster or anyone who can "see" what's going on with this HHO Generator...

    I thought he said the plate configuration was +NNNNN- but it looks like there is a wire attached to both the - and + plates. Is this how this or any suitable plate configuration should be wired?

    On the same note, looking at the plans for the Smackbooster, it looks for sure like he had a wire leading from one plate to another, across each of the plates (I forget how many there were) in his design.

    So those of you in the know... do you attach the - and + plates to one another, and should the Neutral plates be connected somehow to each other?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,418
    It looks to me like +NNNNN-NNNNN+ or -NNNNN+NNNNN-. I see no other possibility.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb."

    ONE Liter per minute per 10 amps which just isn't possible Ha Ha .

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stanfordville, NY
    Posts
    799
    Quote Originally Posted by Amazing1 View Post
    For Zipster or anyone who can "see" what's going on with this HHO Generator...

    I thought he said the plate configuration was +NNNNN- but it looks like there is a wire attached to both the - and + plates. Is this how this or any suitable plate configuration should be wired?

    On the same note, looking at the plans for the Smackbooster, it looks for sure like he had a wire leading from one plate to another, across each of the plates (I forget how many there were) in his design.

    So those of you in the know... do you attach the - and + plates to one another, and should the Neutral plates be connected somehow to each other?
    The Bi-polar (neutral) plates are connected by the current passing through the electrolyte only.
    1998 Explorer 4x4, 4.0
    14 cell / 2 stack 6x9" drycell reactor 28%KOH dual EFIE, MAF enhancer, IAT & ECT controllers, 2.4 LPM @ 30 amps. 6.35 MMW http://reduceyourfuelbill.com.au/forum/index.php

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Zipster View Post
    Who wants one?

    $240 Single up to 1.5L engines
    $360 Dual up to 2.5L engines
    $480 Triple up to 4L engines

    Hurry up these mate prices wont last long.

    Features:

    - Structure ultra solid (no rubber!) life longevity 90% longer than a standard dry cell
    - Improved insulated surface, reducing risks of short circuits
    - Optimised plate holes for minimum current leakage and best flow
    - Side baffles allowing perfect water pressure
    - 0.7 mm 316 stainless steel plates / 3mm 304 stainless steel brackets
    - High quality stainless steel "push-in" fittings (not on picture)

    Hi .


    looks very nice!

    I dont care so much abote LPM im more in to quality hhogas, cool clean monoton gas.

    Can you tell us the MMW and temperature of hhogas output after running your cell 1, 2, 3 hours.

    Have you test cell config that has distance? for example +NNNNN-Distance+NNNNN-Distance+NNNNN-

    Thanks

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by Zipster View Post

    Hurry up these mate prices wont last long.

    Features:

    - Structure ultra solid (no rubber!) life longevity 90% longer than a standard dry cell
    - Improved insulated surface, reducing risks of short circuits
    - Optimised plate holes for minimum current leakage and best flow
    - Side baffles allowing perfect water pressure
    - 0.7 mm 316 stainless steel plates / 3mm 304 stainless steel brackets
    - High quality stainless steel "push-in" fittings (not on picture)
    Nice work!

    Nice "clean" design, but I can imagine that current leakage is still an issue. Honestly, if you raise the price... I think nobody will buy one. For those prices, I would expect a true zero or partial-zero current leakage reactor which sounds like it isn't the case with this design. Don't get me wrong I do like the looks and again the design is super clean, but purchasing reactors isn't really what this community is all about. Most people here would rather build their own. Designing parts and providing necessary supplies might be marginally profitable though.

    Also, on the "no rubber"... can you provide solid evidence that your cell will last 90% longer than a (for example) Shore 60A EDPM gasket model with the same design? Hypothetically speaking, the statement seems to hold some truth, but I think the argument that heat would destroy the rubber might could be ignored as you are using Acrylic end plates with a 160 deg F max rating. Some experimenters seen on YouTube have actually shown Acrylic to crack.

    Overall, I would also like to see some numbers as previously mentioned in this thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •