Originally Posted by
adam001
My testing for my project will not involve any form of unit, I will be using bottled hydrogen and oxygen so it's all bang on.
But my series cell I'm putting on my defender
Adam
Using bottled hydrogen and oxygen won't make any different, as far as what the O2 sensors reads. With HHO being introduced, the O2 sensors read more O2 present because there is less pollutants in the exhaust -- the HHO allows the fuel (either gas or diesel) to burn more completely leaving less pollutants behind. It wouldn't matter if the HHO came from bottles or from an electrolyzer. In fact, it would matter it you injected HHO or just hydrogen -- the results, as far as the O2 reading, would be the same.
However, I would be surprised if either of your vehicles even have O2 sensors. That needs to be the 1st thing y'all check. If they don't have O2 sensors, then you home free and you don't have to worry about it. On a diesel, you should see about 20% improvement without doing anything other than injecting HHO if the vehicle doesn't have any O2 sensors.
If they do have O2 sensors, then you MAY have to treat if with an effie or chip modifier. It depends on the engine. Carter is right -- run the vehicle for at least 2 tank fulls of fuel and see what happens.
1991 Plymouth Acclaim 3L V6.
1 dry cells with nineteen 6"x8" 316L ss plates, driven by constant current PWM set at 35 amps (13.3V at PWM). 28% KOH electrolyte. Total measured output 2.5 lpm. Mileage went from 18 to 26 mpg, all city driving (44% increase). EFIE set at .370 and I still need to play with ignition timing.