Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Plate Configuration issue

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    21

    Plate Configuration issue

    I have a 8 plate cell shown in the attached picture. I submerged it into purified water (a tad over a liter of water), and added .5 teaspoons of baking soda (I hear this isn't the best electrolyte, but I just wanted to make sure the plates were good). As soon as I completed the circuit with my car's battery, it seems like it shorted out. Sparks came out from the terminal which I connected to the battery, and the engine started to die down. Also, after I disconnected everything, the plates were room temp, but the bolts (also stainless steel) were hot. While I assume that means the cell was drawing a ton of Amps, I don't see why.
    What am I doing wrong?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stanfordville, NY
    Posts
    799
    Well, if you have s/s washers between each plate, you're causing a dead short across everything. If you're intent on building a wet-cell (not recommended), you need to use nylon washers instead. Do some research before you get hurt.
    1998 Explorer 4x4, 4.0
    14 cell / 2 stack 6x9" drycell reactor 28%KOH dual EFIE, MAF enhancer, IAT & ECT controllers, 2.4 LPM @ 30 amps. 6.35 MMW http://reduceyourfuelbill.com.au/forum/index.php

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by lhazleton View Post
    Well, if you have s/s washers between each plate, you're causing a dead short across everything. If you're intent on building a wet-cell (not recommended), you need to use nylon washers instead. Do some research before you get hurt.
    Thanks, that's what I thought. I'm building a wet cell because it seems like a good starting point. (For a newbie to this whole thing)

    If the SS washers are causing a short across everything, would the bolts do the same? Would I have to connect an individual + and - wire to each plate before routing them all into a battery?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NorthEast Fla.
    Posts
    988
    Quote Originally Posted by Outmodeduser View Post
    Thanks, that's what I thought. I'm building a wet cell because it seems like a good starting point. (For a newbie to this whole thing)

    If the SS washers are causing a short across everything, would the bolts do the same? Would I have to connect an individual + and - wire to each plate before routing them all into a battery?
    If you're just experimenting with wet cells for the time being, build it like this to see lots of bubbles...
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by BioFarmer93 View Post
    If you're just experimenting with wet cells for the time being, build it like this to see lots of bubbles...
    Thanks a bunch. I love how stupid I feel now that its visualized. That being said, I have 8 plates. I've read on this forum that other people new to this like I am are using a -nnn+nnn- configuration. Is there an advantage to this?

    Oh, as I edit this, I would like to point out that this whole hydrogen cell project I am working on is a research methods project on weather or not you can see a increase in fuel efficiency in a vehicle from using a hydrogen cell. Obviously I am just getting started, and there is more to it. Is there any scientific studies that have been published about this that describe the process? Any reliable scientific sources that I could cite in my study?

  6. #6
    I'm with Lee on this one. If you're building a wet cell to see lots of bubbles produced, you can do the same with a bottle of 7-up and a mentos - with next to no danger involved. If you're really out for research to improve fuel economy you should skip to a dry cell. It's more efficient to begin with.

    Everyone's gotta start somewhere though. Just be careful wherever you decide to start.

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stanfordville, NY
    Posts
    799
    Gus>> Love the 'noobpic' diagram. Is this your newest project?????????????
    1998 Explorer 4x4, 4.0
    14 cell / 2 stack 6x9" drycell reactor 28%KOH dual EFIE, MAF enhancer, IAT & ECT controllers, 2.4 LPM @ 30 amps. 6.35 MMW http://reduceyourfuelbill.com.au/forum/index.php

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NorthEast Fla.
    Posts
    988
    Quote Originally Posted by lhazleton View Post
    Gus>> Love the 'noobpic' diagram. Is this your newest project?????????????
    NO.... Ya knucklehead, to see my newest project go here...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iioQ4kp8MNM

    Actually, I think I did it for that Chris0147 character that you admire so much... You know, the one that got my hair.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by nst6563 View Post
    I'm with Lee on this one. If you're building a wet cell to see lots of bubbles produced, you can do the same with a bottle of 7-up and a mentos - with next to no danger involved. If you're really out for research to improve fuel economy you should skip to a dry cell. It's more efficient to begin with.

    Everyone's gotta start somewhere though. Just be careful wherever you decide to start.
    I just figured that bubbles = hydrogen. Lots of bubbles = lots of hydrogen. Lots of hydrogen = good. I'm trying to be as careful as I can, but once school starts up again and I can get some lab time in a safe (not a three seasons porch workshop) environment.
    How inefficient is a wet cell? Like "oh this is the worst thing ever" or "meh, this will do". I'm a bike mechanic, so when people say one crank is less efficient than the other, they are talking about weight, stiffness, and speed. But both do the job. Will a wet cell still be good enough for my research?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •