Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: joe cell v.s. dry cell

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    28

    joe cell v.s. dry cell

    which one is better. gonna start bulding soon. just dont want to make any mistakes other people made already and im hearing good things on youtube about the joe cell.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    35
    for some reason anything i read online about the joe cell completely sounds like total bull$hit to me. it charges the engine and the coolant, and after its fully charged the engine can run without the joe cell or spark plug wires as long as the distributor and coil remain functional. does anyone seriously buy this crap? oh and also it collects mystical "orgone" energy and has healing properties right? hey mabey i can invent a joe rod and cast magic spells with it after chargeing it up with the joe cell right???

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,418
    for some reason anything i read online about the joe cell completely sounds like total bull$hit to me. it charges the engine and the coolant, and after its fully charged the engine can run without the joe cell or spark plug wires as long as the distributor and coil remain functional. does anyone seriously buy this crap? oh and also it collects mystical "orgone" energy and has healing properties right? hey mabey i can invent a joe rod and cast magic spells with it after chargeing it up with the joe cell right???
    I suggest you post your test procedures and results before you call it BS. Keep the discussion to facts that you have tested and not what you think is BS. This is not a confirmation of the Joe Cell and its technology or a denial of it but unless you have tested it and can publish your finding for others to test I would refrain from calling it BS. There is more to all of this than most understand!! There is a lot of junk science also so one must test it before making statements that can be taken as fact. Have an open mind and do the work and then post the results and the procedures you used.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb."

    ONE Liter per minute per 10 amps which just isn't possible Ha Ha .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by myoldyourgold View Post
    I suggest you post your test procedures and results before you call it BS. Keep the discussion to facts that you have tested and not what you think is BS. This is not a confirmation of the Joe Cell and its technology or a denial of it but unless you have tested it and can publish your finding for others to test I would refrain from calling it BS. There is more to all of this than most understand!! There is a lot of junk science also so one must test it before making statements that can be taken as fact. Have an open mind and do the work and then post the results and the procedures you used.
    I agree with myoldyourgold.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    35
    ok..... anyone got a orgone meter kicking around that i can borrow?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Jamaica
    Posts
    170
    Joe cell sounded interesting...until I read up on it, and found that it was a very "spiritual" thing. I try to stay away from "mystical" things like those. It's almost in the class of the Ouija Board. Funny how so many people think that that is "just a game" -they should read more often.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    São Paulo - BRAZIL
    Posts
    10

    EPEC creates hydrogen from air

    Guys, there is a new tecnology on the market, something new, it will blow your head off, The EPEC (Electron Proton Energy Cell).
    EPEC cell uses no water, operates with less than a amp, no eletrolyte is needed , the device creates hydrogen from air, believe it or not.


    http://hhogames.com/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    105
    Interesting! I do not think that its the hydrogen at work here but I could be wrong.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1
    Supposedly cylindrical designs produce better gas than flat plates. I assume this means that new spherical HHO generator would produce better gas than cylindrical.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •