Your posts are there for all to see. When you fail to grasp the subject matter you simply devolve into fractured logic, fractured sentences, fractured spelling and personal attacks. I simply challenge the validity of "free energy" in a forceful but logical manner. You take it as a personal attack. That is your and others problem - the inability to debate.
Many people view my posts with favor. Of course they are people who like science and engineering. I have PMs and emails that show that there is a thinking population of readers on this forum. Many are as equally capable, if not more so than I am, in their respective fields and it is refreshing to engage in challenging discourse with them.
I have benefited from this forum not just because of the work I have picked up from readers who want some real fabrication and engineering,but because I have had my learning expanded and catalyzed by some of the ideas put out in various threads.
You may not think I have value on this forum, but many others see differently.
My last post to you was double edged. A fork in the road, and as a form of applause for not continuing in such a boorish way. It also could be seen as a dig in the ribs for not coming up with some witty comeback. You saw it as an affront. I am sorry you did. But take it any way you want. The problem of the internet.
And the parallel of the whaling vessel . . . it is illogical . . . whales are hunted and not baited.